Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Sept 2013

Mentoring and Personal Relationships Are Perceived Benefits of Serving as an Athletic Training Preceptor

PhD, ATC,
PhD, ATC, and
PhD, ATC, CSCS
Page Range: 35 – 40
DOI: 10.4085/080335
Save
Download PDF

Context

Preceptors play a vital role in athletic training education as they mentor and socialize athletic training students into their professional role. Exploring the benefits to serving as a preceptor is important to secure appropriate professional role models for students.

Objective

To determine the benefits of serving as an athletic training preceptor.

Design

Qualitative study.

Setting

Undergraduate athletic training programs (ATPs).

Patients or Other Participants

Twenty-four preceptors (average age = 32 ± 7 years, 11 male, 13 female, average clinical experience = 9 ± 6 years, average preceptor experience = 5 ± 3 years) volunteered to participate in our study. Participants represented 7 undergraduate Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education–accredited ATPs from the east coast.

Data Collection and Analysis

We asked participants to journal responses to open-ended questions through a QuestionPro online survey. We analyzed data using a general inductive approach. We secured credibility by using consistency and stakeholder checks and by having a peer review our work.

Results

Three main themes emerged from the data. Preceptors enjoy the personal relationships they build with students. The challenging atmosphere of supervising students while they gain knowledge to improve their skills also came through as a major benefit to serving as a preceptor. Finally, our participants enjoy teaching and mentoring the future members of the athletic training profession.

Conclusions

Our participants listed the relationships they build with students as rewarding, potentially leading to an improved professional commitment. Reciprocal learning between the preceptors and the students allows for a stimulating environment and has the potential to improve patient care. The enjoyment of teaching and mentoring students may aid in providing a dynamic atmosphere for students to learn.

INTRODUCTION

Professional athletic training education requires students to complete didactic classes and a minimum of 2 academic years of clinical education experience. Clinical education must be completed under the direct supervision of a state-credentialed medical or allied health care professional in an appropriate clinical-education setting, with the majority of the experiences supervised by a state athletic training–credentialed preceptor. The main purpose of clinical education is to allow students opportunities to learn and practice athletic training skills, ultimately leading to entry-level clinical proficiency and professional behavior.1 Clinical education also helps socialize students to the roles and responsibilities of the athletic training profession.2

An important component to the socialization of athletic training students in the clinical-education setting is the preceptor.2 Previous research has identified 7 standards for selecting, training, and evaluating those who serve as preceptors, including legal and ethical behavior, communication skills, appropriate interpersonal relationships, instructional skills, supervisory and administrative skills, the ability to evaluate student performance, and clinical skills and knowledge.3 These standards have been viewed as appropriate for a variety of athletic training clinical-education settings, making them useful for program directors and athletic training educators when selecting preceptors. However, several barriers to the implementation of the standards have been identified, such as role strain, a lack of communication with the athletic training program (ATP), and a lack of continuing education geared toward recent additions to the competencies.4 Additional challenges often experienced by preceptors include long hours, lack of compensation, and occasional personality conflicts with students.5 These barriers and challenges may lead some preceptors to become disinterested in mentoring students, or they may result in a lack of student engagement during clinical education experiences. Unfortunately, upper-level students spend 59% of their clinical education time disengaged,6 perhaps because preceptors do not have time to devote to students, occupied as they are with the multiple responsibilities of their health care position.7 Clinical-education experiences that lack appropriate autonomy and authentic experiences can lead to student frustration8 and can hinder learning.9 Conversely, clinical-education experiences that allow quality hands-on experience, clinical diversity, and clinical integration allow for improved student learning10 and development of clinical readiness,11 thus highlighting the importance of time spent in clinical education.

Athletic training students perceive that 53% of their professional development comes from clinical education,12 during which time they receive mentorship from preceptors, stressing the importance of recruiting and retaining quality preceptors. Furthermore, students consider preceptors to be mentors who are important in their professional socialization.13 Although the barriers to implementing the clinical-instruction standards have been identified as well as the challenges associated with serving as a preceptor, there is a lack of data on the positive aspects of serving as an athletic training preceptor. It is important to identify what the benefits are to mentoring students to help give potential preceptors a full depiction of the role of the preceptor and to aid in recruitment efforts. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to identify the benefits to serving as an athletic training preceptor.

METHODS

We chose to use qualitative methods with a general inductive approach to uncover the benefits of serving as a preceptor. Using a general inductive approach is appropriate when the researchers want to determine a connection between the data and the research questions.14 Further, we were particularly interested in how preceptors make meaning out of their experiences mentoring students15 through personal interactions,16 making qualitative methods suitable for our study.

Participants

We gathered the e-mail addresses for 52 athletic training preceptors across the east coast from our professional relationships and sent a recruitment e-mail for our study. From this e-mail, we secured 24 participants who were serving as preceptors (average age = 32 ± 7 years, 11 male, 13 female). We used data saturation as a guide to recruitment; after an initial analysis, we ceased recruitment after 24 responses. The participants had an average of 9 ± 6 years of clinical experience and an average of 5 ± 3 years of experience serving as an athletic training preceptor. Participants represented 7 Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education–accredited ATPs from the east coast. Our participants were evenly distributed between intercollegiate athletics (n = 12) and the secondary school setting (n = 12).

Data Collection Procedures

We developed an open-ended questionnaire using the QuestionPro (QuestionPro Inc, Seattle, WA) secure online survey management tool. We chose to use online data collection instead of more traditional methods (eg, telephone or face-to-face interviews) because of the flexibility afforded to the participants regarding completion of the open-ended questions. Preceptors often have limited free time due to the multiple responsibilities they fulfill. Aside from being convenient, using online journaling also offers the participant a sense of confidentiality and gives an extended amount of time for reflection before responding, both of which are difficult to provide during other data-collection methods.17

After the Institutional Review Board of the host institution approved the study, we sent an e-mail to the participants that included a brief description of the study and the link to the questionnaire. The first page of the questionnaire was an approved informed-consent form, which the participants agreed to by completing the questionnaire. The first section asked participants basic demographic information such as age and years of experience. The next section contained several open-ended questions that asked participants to journal their responses with as much detail as possible in a reflective manner. The questions were focused on gaining insight into the roles and responsibilities of preceptors, for example, “What do you like best, or what are the good things about being a preceptor?” The participants had an unlimited amount of space to use when responding. We had an athletic training educator with experience in qualitative data collection and a preceptor review the questions to ensure clarity and content before we initiated data collection. The peer and the preceptor both offered no suggestions for editing the questions; therefore, we moved to data collection.

Data Analysis and Credibility

We analyzed data using a general inductive approach14 to uncover the prominent themes associated with our research question. We ensured the confidentiality of the participants by obtaining transcripts from QuestionPro with no links to the participants' identities. Initially we read through the transcripts several times to become familiar with the responses of all the participants. After reading the transcripts several times, we began coding the data by applying labels; 2 authors (T.G.B. and S.M.M.) completed this process independently. During subsequent analyses of the data, we combined labels into categories to reduce redundancy. Finally, we developed themes from the data guided by our research question. We negotiated over the final themes until we came to 100% agreement. The negotiation involved modifying the name of the themes, but we achieved consensus on the data separation into themes.

Credibility or trustworthiness in qualitative research refers to the authenticity of the data and the interpretations.16 Creswell18 recommends using at least 2 methods to secure the credibility of a study. Based on this recommendation, we used consistency checks while analyzing the data and completed a stakeholder check and peer review.14 During consistency checks, 2 authors (T.G.B. and S.M.M.) communicated about the emerging themes during 2 meetings after analyzing the data independently. We negotiated over the coding structure and final themes until we came to full agreement. Following the agreement of the final themes, we randomly selected 2 participants and asked them to review the presentation of the findings to ensure accuracy and provide feedback for improvement. The stakeholders requested no modifications to the manuscript. Finally, we asked an athletic training educator trained in qualitative methods and who has experience as a preceptor to review the data-collection procedures, transcripts, and final themes to ensure methodological rigor, maintain the objectivity of the data, and reduce researcher biasing.

RESULTS

We were able to identify 3 main themes that emerged from the data (see Figure). Preceptors enjoy the personal relationships they build with students. The challenging atmosphere of supervising students while they gain knowledge to improve their skills also came through as a major benefit to serving as a preceptor. Finally, our participants enjoyed teaching and mentoring the future members of the athletic training profession.

Figure. . The 3 main themes that emerged from the data.Figure. . The 3 main themes that emerged from the data.Figure. . The 3 main themes that emerged from the data.
Figure.  The 3 main themes that emerged from the data.

Citation: Athletic Training Education Journal 8, 3; 10.4085/080335

DISCUSSION

The 3 themes are defined, supported with participant quotes, and discussed in the following sections.

Personal Relationships

Professional satisfaction and pursuit of a career in athletic training appears to be rooted in helping people and building relationships with peers and student athletes.19,20 Our participants' discussions support these attractors, noting that they were able to build personal relationships with their students and viewed this as a major benefit to serving as a preceptor. One participant responded that the best part of serving as a preceptor was “building relationships with the students. I have the opportunity to field questions they may not ask the instructor. It is always cool to see former students coming back to see you when they don't have to.” Another participant agreed, stating, “I like developing relationships with the students and seeing them grow in confidence and ability. I always enjoy when my students come back to visit after they finish rotations.” Finally, one participant also mentioned the rewarding feeling when students build professional relationships with the team. He remarked that one of the good things about being a preceptor was “seeing the [students] be adopted by the team and trust them enough to go to them with their injuries. Also, seeing the light ‘turn on' in the [students] and they finally understand the big picture. The relationships I build with the students are priceless.”

The importance for preceptors of developing professional relationships is similar to what students have stated they like best about being in an ATP. Previous work has found that students persisted in ATPs because of the strong relationships they developed during clinical education.21 Based on our results, it appears personal relationships are also important for an athletic trainer persisting in the role of a preceptor. Similarly, students noted positive interactions with preceptors as a major reason for wanting to complete a degree in athletic training.22 We agree with previous research22 that suggests positive relationships between students and preceptors may aid in socializing students into the professional roles and responsibilities of an athletic trainer especially because students identify preceptors as mentors.13 The effects of positive preceptor mentoring have also been found in the nursing literature and illustrate that serving as a preceptor can be rewarding.23,24 Rewarding experiences, such as serving as a preceptor, are an important facilitator for an athletic trainer's continued professional commitment25; therefore, these personal relationships can serve as a means to increase professional commitment and enthusiasm.

Challenging Atmosphere

The preceptors who participated in our study enjoyed the fact that supervising students made for a dynamic and stimulating environment. Supervising the student afforded the preceptors with the chance to engage in learning,26 which was often viewed as reciprocal learning because of the communication and discourse fostered during the clinical-education experience. One participant commented that being a preceptor is enjoyable because

I think it keeps you learning new things by having to explain things and the rationale for what you're doing. Having students can help you become a better athletic trainer and communicator because if you really care about the student's future you will take your time and explain things in depth.

Similarly, a participant highlighted the importance of reciprocal learning, which has been noted in previous literature regarding the role of the preceptor.26 The preceptor stated that mentoring students “keeps me on my toes, I read ten times more often now looking for new topics to talk about [with students]. The students also tell me what they are learning that has changed since I was in school.” Another preceptor stated that her skills improved when she started supervising students in the clinical setting. She stated, “I get daily opportunities to have my brain picked as to why I made a certain clinical decision. My own clinical skills are reinforced daily.” Finally, a parallel feeling was held by a preceptor who also mentioned learning from the students. He stated that serving as a preceptor

keeps me on my toes. I enjoy the challenge they bring when they ask why I do something and the new knowledge they sometimes bring to the table. [I'll give you an] example. I was unfamiliar with a setting on my e-stim machine, and one of my students was learning about it in her modalities class so she walked me through how and why to use it. Now I use it all the time.

The preceptors in our study enjoyed the positive enthusiasm students brought with them to the clinical site. Our participants enjoyed the fact that students challenged them and inspired their professional commitment through reciprocal learning and a sense of responsibility to the students. The finding that serving as a preceptor encouraged our participants to read literature relevant to athletic training has the potential to greatly affect the practitioner's standing as an evidence-based provider of healthcare. Our participants believed it was important to be current with professional literature to help them teach students new information and explain their actions. We also believe students facilitated the further development of critical thinking skills in our participants because they used clinical questioning as a means to stimulate their own learning by engaging in discourse with the preceptors. Student inquisitiveness required the preceptors to be able to provide rationale behind their patient care and implementation of specific methods and treatments. We believe this is similar to the development of a network to facilitate learning, which has been found to be a socializing factor for athletic trainers at the secondary school setting.27 This was especially evident in the example above in which an athletic training student helped a preceptor understand a specific function on a modality unit.

Teaching and Mentoring

The final theme reported by the participants had to do with the satisfaction of teaching and mentoring the future of the profession. This finding supports previous work showing that interest in and love of teaching are major attractors to the role of the program director in an ATP.28 Serving as a role model and mentor to future athletic training professionals was also an important factor in deciding to become an athletic training educator, similar to our participants' decision to become a preceptor. For example, one participant took particular interest in mentoring prospective athletic trainers. She stated that the best part of serving as a preceptor is “knowing I am contributing to a student becoming an outstanding athletic trainer one day. I know they will take at least one thing they learn from me with them into their career.” Two additional preceptors stated that they enjoyed when students, because of their guidance, started to make connections between areas of knowledge and synthesize those connections to solve problems. In the first example, one preceptor said, “I love having the teaching moments with the [students]. When I am able to really teach them something and see it ‘click' with them and then see them put it into practice is great.” Likewise, another participant stated that the thing she likes the best about serving as a preceptor is “mentoring the student. I have been blessed with having such great [students]. Seeing a student light up with the ‘ah ha!' moments in a procedure is very satisfying.”

The final theme—the enjoyment preceptors took in teaching and mentoring future athletic trainers—is a noteworthy finding for athletic training program directors and clinical-education coordinators. Role strain has been identified as a barrier to implementation of the clinical-education qualities necessary to serve as a preceptor.4 It is possible that for our participants the benefits of interacting with students has outweighed the potential role strain that might occur as they have continued serving as preceptors. During clinical education, preceptors may not have sufficient time to teach athletic training students because of their own responsibilities with patient care.7 However, it is important to keep athletic training students engaged during clinical education because positive interactions between students and preceptors facilitate the students' professional socialization and their persistence to graduation.22 Also, if students enjoy their clinical-education experiences, they may be more likely to stay in the program, as they see their time as being well spent.29 We believe the finding that preceptors enjoy teaching and mentoring students is particularly significant, because early integration into the clinical-education site can help give students a sense of belonging and positively influence student retention in an ATP.21,22

Recommendations

Based on the findings of our study, we recommend that program directors and clinical-education coordinators promote the benefits of supervising students to prospective preceptors as a means to recruit and retain appropriate professional role models for athletic training students. It is also important to provide preceptors with information regarding best practices in regards to clinical instruction. Specifically, preceptors need to be trained in ways to effectively communicate, engage the student in the clinical setting, and provide feedback, as these factors can improve the overall experience for both the student and preceptor. We also urge athletic training educational administrators to find unique and attractive benefits for those serving as preceptors to aid in keeping morale high and providing a positive clinical-education environment, which fosters student learning. Such things as providing free Continuing Education Units may provide preceptors with a sense of gratitude and motivate them to continue mentoring students in a positive way.

Limitations

It is important to note several limitations to our study. As is common with qualitative research, generalizing our results to other populations is a challenge. Although we secured responses from individuals serving as preceptors from several different ATPs, we used a convenience sample to recruit our participants. Researchers using different sample groups may find results that are contradictory to the ones we report. Also, using online journaling as a data-collection strategy does not allow for participant-researcher interaction to the extent that face-to-face or telephone interviewing permits. Using other data collection methods could also produce different results.

CONCLUSIONS

We found 3 themes that explained why athletic training preceptors enjoyed mentoring students. For our participants, the personal relationships they developed with students, the challenging atmosphere students created by asking questions, and the ability to teach and mentor future professionals outweighed the potential role strain of supervising students. The role of the athletic training preceptor can be challenging5 and time intensive; therefore, it is important for those engaged in the role to be aware of the positive outcomes of supervising students. We believe these findings are important to allow ATP administrators to facilitate clinical-education environments that not only facilitate student learning, but provide a stimulating and rewarding experience for preceptors. Educating athletic trainers regarding the role of the preceptor should include a holistic approach and not just a list of difficulties. By discussing the benefits to the role of the preceptor, more athletic trainers may be attracted to mentoring students and remain in the supervisory role.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education. Standards for the Academic Accreditation of Professional Athletic Training Programs.
    Round Rock, TX
    :
    Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education;
    2012.
  • 2
    Klossner J.
    The role of legitimation in the professional socialization of second-year undergraduate athletic training students. J Athl Train. 2008;43(
    4
    ):379385.
  • 3
    Weidner TG,
    Henning JM.
    Development of standards and criteria for the selection, training, and evaluation of athletic training approved clinical instructors. J Athl Train. 2004;39(
    4
    ):335343.
  • 4
    Weidner TG,
    Henning JM.
    Importance and applicability of approved clinical instructor standards and criteria to certified athletic trainers in different clinical education settings. J Athl Train. 2005;40(
    4
    ):326332.
  • 5
    Dodge TM,
    Mazerolle SM,
    Bowman TG.
    Challenges faced by clinical preceptors serving in dual roles as healthcare providers and clinical educators. Athl Train Educ J. In press.
  • 6
    Miller MG,
    Berry DC.
    An assessment of athletic training students' clinical-placement hours. J Athl Train. 2002;37(
    suppl 4
    ):S229S235.
  • 7
    Weidner TG,
    Henning JM.
    Historical perspective of athletic training clinical education. J Athl Train. 2002;37(
    suppl 4
    ):S222S228.
  • 8
    Bowman TG,
    Dodge TM.
    Frustrations among graduates of athletic training education programs. J Athl Train. 2013;48(
    1
    ):7986.
  • 9
    Sexton P,
    Levy LS,
    Willeford KS,
    et al
    . Supervised autonomy. Athl Train Educ J. 2009;4(
    1
    ):1418.
  • 10
    Mazerolle SM,
    Benes SS.
    Factors influencing senior athletic training students' preparedness to enter the workforce. Athl Train Educ J. In press.
  • 11
    Mazerolle SM,
    Dodge TM.
    Role of clinical education experiences on athletic training students' development of professional commitment. Athl Train Educ J. In press.
  • 12
    Laurent TG,
    Weidner TG.
    Clinical-education-setting standards and experiences are helpful in the professional preparation of employed, entry-level certified athletic trainers. J Athl Train. 2002;37(
    suppl 4
    ):S248S254.
  • 13
    Pitney WA,
    Ehlers GG.
    A grounded theory study of the mentoring process involved with undergraduate athletic training students. J Athl Train. 2004;39(
    4
    ):344351.
  • 14
    Thomas D.
    A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Am J Eval. 2006;27(
    2
    ):237246.
  • 15
    Fraenkel JR,
    Wallen NE.
    How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 3rd ed.
    New York, NY
    :
    McGraw-Hill;
    1996.
  • 16
    Pitney WA,
    Parker J.
    Qualitative inquiry in athletic training: principles, possibilities, and promises. J Athl Train. 2001;36(
    2
    ):185189.
  • 17
    Meho LI.
    E-mail interview in qualitative research: a methodological discussion. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(
    10
    ):12841295.
  • 18
    Creswell JW.
    Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed.
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    :
    Sage;
    2007.
  • 19
    Kaiser DA.
    Finding satisfaction as an athletic trainer. Athl Ther Today. 2005;10(
    6
    ):1824.
  • 20
    Mensch J,
    Mitchell M.
    Choosing a career in athletic training: exploring the perceptions of potential recruits. J Athl Train. 2008;43(
    1
    ):7079.
  • 21
    Dodge TM,
    Mitchell MF,
    Mensch JM.
    Student retention in athletic training education programs. J Athl Train. 2009;44(
    2
    ):197207.
  • 22
    Bowman TG,
    Dodge TM.
    Factors of persistence among graduates of athletic training education programs. J Athl Train. 2011;46(
    6
    ):665671.
  • 23
    Shelton EN.
    Faculty support and student retention. J Nurse Educ. 2003;42(
    2
    ):6876.
  • 24
    Ryan D,
    Brewer K. Mentorship
    and professional role development in undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Educ. 1997;22(
    6
    ):2024.
  • 25
    Pitney WA.
    A qualitative examination of professional role commitment among athletic trainers working in the secondary school setting. J Athl Train. 2010;45(
    2
    ):198204.
  • 26
    Dodge TM,
    Mazerolle SM.
    Preceptors influence on athletic training students' development of excitement and commitment to the field of athletic training. Athl Train Educ J. In press.
  • 27
    Pitney WA.
    Professional socialization of certified athletic trainers in high school settings: a grounded theory investigation. J Athl Train. 2002;37(
    3
    ):286292.
  • 28
    Judd MR,
    Perkins SA.
    Athletic training education program directors' perceptions on job selection, satisfaction, and attrition. J Athl Train. 2004;39(
    2
    ):185192.
  • 29
    Racchini J.
    Enhancing student retention. Athl Ther Today. 2005;10(
    3
    ):4850.
<bold>Figure</bold>
. 
Figure . 

The 3 main themes that emerged from the data.


Contributor Notes

Dr Bowman is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Athletic Training at Lynchburg College.

Please address all correspondence to Thomas G. Bowman, PhD, ATC, Department of Athletic Training, 1501 Lakeside Drive, Lynchburg College, VA 24501. bowman.t@lynchburg.edu.
  • Download PDF