Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reinjury From Return-to-Activity Assessments at 6 Months Postsurgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Participants

All patients were referred from a multisurgeon academic orthopaedic subspecialty practice to complete a battery of functional assessments in a controlled laboratory setting at approximately 6 months post-ACLR. The data in this study were collected as part of an ongoing program in which patients routinely complete postoperative assessments after lower extremity surgery.^11,14 Patients and their clinicians were provided a detailed report, including the data from the assessment, to guide rehabilitation progressions and RTA decision making. Because this study was a point-of-care research design, we did not know if or how the data were used to manage the patient's rehabilitation. Patients were included in the analyses if they had a history of primary, isolated, unilateral ACLR confirmed in their medical records. Patients were excluded from analyses if they had a history of other lower extremity surgery, concomitant ligament reconstruction, surgical complications, or any neurologic disorder. Participants followed the same postoperative rehabilitation guidelines distributed by their surgeon. This study was approved by our university's institutional review board, and all patients voluntarily provided written informed consent.

Patient-Reported Outcomes

After enrolling and providing consent, all participants completed the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form to evaluate subjective knee function. These measures are valid and reliable in patients after ACLR.¹⁷ The preinjury level of physical activity was quantified via the Tegner Activity Scale.¹⁸ Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and global function through the Veterans Rand 12-Item Survey.

Knee-Extensor and -Flexor Strength

Isokinetic concentric peak knee-flexion and -extension torques were measured bilaterally using a dynamometer (model IV; Biodex Medical Systems) at a speed of 90°/s. All testing was performed first on the uninvolved limb and then on the involved limb. Participants completed practice trials with each limb for familiarization before testing. They were orally encouraged to provide maximal effort through their full range of motion for 8 test contractions.

Single-Legged Hopping

Single-legged hopping performance was measured bilaterally using a battery of 3 hopping tasks, as follows: the single hop for distance, the triple hop for distance, and the 6-m timed hop. The participant was given as many practice trials as needed until he or she was comfortable completing the task. Testing was performed first on the uninvolved limb, followed by the involved limb, for a total of 3 trials on each limb. All hopping tasks required the participant to maintain single-limb stability at the end of each hop. Tasks for distance were measured from the toe at the start to the heel at the landing, and the average distance across the 3 trials was used for analysis. The 6-m timed hop was instrumented with timing gates (FITLIGHT Corp) that were placed 1 m off the ground at the start and finish.

Two-Year Follow-Up

Follow-up assessments for all patients occurred at ≥2 years post-ACLR. Data were obtained via phone interview, email, or a subsequent clinic visit identified through a medical record review. Patients were assessed about the (1) ability to RTA and (2) incidence of secondary ACL injury to the primary involved or contralateral knee. The dates of RTA and ACL reinjury were collected when available.

Data Processing

Unilateral measures of peak torque were normalized to the participant's body mass (Nm/kg). Strength and hopping symmetry measures were calculated using the following equation: \(\def\upalpha{\unicode[Times]{x3B1}}\)\(\def\upbeta{\unicode[Times]{x3B2}}\)\(\def\upgamma{\unicode[Times]{x3B3}}\)\(\def\updelta{\unicode[Times]{x3B4}}\)\(\def\upvarepsilon{\unicode[Times]{x3B5}}\)\(\def\upzeta{\unicode[Times]{x3B6}}\)\(\def\upeta{\unicode[Times]{x3B7}}\)\(\def\uptheta{\unicode[Times]{x3B8}}\)\(\def\upiota{\unicode[Times]{x3B9}}\)\(\def\upkappa{\unicode[Times]{x3BA}}\)\(\def\uplambda{\unicode[Times]{x3BB}}\)\(\def\upmu{\unicode[Times]{x3BC}}\)\(\def\upnu{\unicode[Times]{x3BD}}\)\(\def\upxi{\unicode[Times]{x3BE}}\)\(\def\upomicron{\unicode[Times]{x3BF}}\)\(\def\uppi{\unicode[Times]{x3C0}}\)\(\def\uprho{\unicode[Times]{x3C1}}\)\(\def\upsigma{\unicode[Times]{x3C3}}\)\(\def\uptau{\unicode[Times]{x3C4}}\)\(\def\upupsilon{\unicode[Times]{x3C5}}\)\(\def\upphi{\unicode[Times]{x3C6}}\)\(\def\upchi{\unicode[Times]{x3C7}}\)\(\def\uppsy{\unicode[Times]{x3C8}}\)\(\def\upomega{\unicode[Times]{x3C9}}\)\(\def\bialpha{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\)\(\def\bibeta{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\)\(\def\bigamma{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\)\(\def\bidelta{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\)\(\def\bivarepsilon{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\)\(\def\bizeta{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\)\(\def\bieta{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\)\(\def\bitheta{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\)\(\def\biiota{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\)\(\def\bikappa{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\)\(\def\bilambda{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\)\(\def\bimu{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\)\(\def\binu{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\)\(\def\bixi{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\)\(\def\biomicron{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\)\(\def\bipi{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\)\(\def\birho{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\)\(\def\bisigma{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\)\(\def\bitau{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\)\(\def\biupsilon{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\)\(\def\biphi{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\)\(\def\bichi{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\)\(\def\bipsy{\boldsymbol{\psy}}\)\(\def\biomega{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\)\(\def\bupalpha{\bf{\alpha}}\)\(\def\bupbeta{\bf{\beta}}\)\(\def\bupgamma{\bf{\gamma}}\)\(\def\bupdelta{\bf{\delta}}\)\(\def\bupvarepsilon{\bf{\varepsilon}}\)\(\def\bupzeta{\bf{\zeta}}\)\(\def\bupeta{\bf{\eta}}\)\(\def\buptheta{\bf{\theta}}\)\(\def\bupiota{\bf{\iota}}\)\(\def\bupkappa{\bf{\kappa}}\)\(\def\buplambda{\bf{\lambda}}\)\(\def\bupmu{\bf{\mu}}\)\(\def\bupnu{\bf{\nu}}\)\(\def\bupxi{\bf{\xi}}\)\(\def\bupomicron{\bf{\micron}}\)\(\def\buppi{\bf{\pi}}\)\(\def\buprho{\bf{\rho}}\)\(\def\bupsigma{\bf{\sigma}}\)\(\def\buptau{\bf{\tau}}\)\(\def\bupupsilon{\bf{\upsilon}}\)\(\def\bupphi{\bf{\phi}}\)\(\def\bupchi{\bf{\chi}}\)\(\def\buppsy{\bf{\psy}}\)\(\def\bupomega{\bf{\omega}}\)\(\def\bGamma{\bf{\Gamma}}\)\(\def\bDelta{\bf{\Delta}}\)\(\def\bTheta{\bf{\Theta}}\)\(\def\bLambda{\bf{\Lambda}}\)\(\def\bXi{\bf{\Xi}}\)\(\def\bPi{\bf{\Pi}}\)\(\def\bSigma{\bf{\Sigma}}\)\(\def\bPhi{\bf{\Phi}}\)\(\def\bPsi{\bf{\Psi}}\)\(\def\bOmega{\bf{\Omega}}\)\begin{equation}{\rm{Limb\ Symmetry}} = \left( {{{{\rm{Involved\ Limb}}} \over {{\rm{Uninvolved\ Limb}}}}} \right) \times 100.\end{equation}

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive demographic statistics were collected for all patients with a 2-year follow-up and for all patients who returned to activity. Descriptive statistics were obtained for time to RTA, time from ACLR to secondary injury, and time from RTA to secondary injury.

Return to Activity

Of the 192 patients, 155 returned to their prior level of physical activity (80.7%). Descriptive information on the time of RTA and reinjury is provided in Figure 2, and RTA logistic regression statistics are available in Table 2. Factors that increased the probability of RTA were higher values for the KOOS Sport, IKDC score, quadriceps symmetry, and single-legged hop symmetry.

View Figure

• Download as Powerpoint
• Download Figure

Table 2 Logistic Regression to Identify Factors Associated With Return to Activity Controlled for Age, Sex, and Preinjury Activity Level (n = 192)

View Fullscreen

Reinjury

Of the 155 patients who returned to their prior level of physical activity, 44 (28.4%) had a secondary ACL injury (Figure 1). The overall proportion of reinjury between males and females did not differ (χ² = 0.13, P = .86). Among patients who incurred a secondary ACL injury, a greater proportion of females reinjured the contralateral ACL (15/24, 62.5%) and a greater proportion of males reinjured the ipsilateral ACL graft (15/20, 75.0%; χ² = 6.18, P = .017). Of the 155 patients who returned to activity, the graft type distribution was patellar tendon = 95 (61.3%); hamstrings = 58 (37.4%); and quadriceps tendon = 2 (1.3%). For all analyses of graft type, those with quadriceps tendon grafts were removed due to the small sample size. No differences were present between patellar tendon and hamstrings grafts in the proportion (χ² = 0.24, P = .71) or side (χ² = 1.81, P = .23) of reinjury.

Logistic regression statistics for reinjury can be found in Table 3. Factors that increased the probability of reinjury were higher values for the KOOS Sport, knee-extensor symmetry, and triple-hop symmetry.

Table 3 Logistic Regression to Identify Factors Associated With Reinjury Controlled for Age, Sex, and Preinjury Activity Level in Participants Who Returned to Sport (n = 155)

View Fullscreen

A total of 78 patients (50.3%) returned to activity at <8 months after ACLR. Among patients with early RTA (<8 months), neither quadriceps strength (B = 0.80, P = .20, odds ratio [OR] = 2.22 [95% CI = 0.67, 3.74]) nor time to RTA (B = 0.495, P = .10, OR = 1.64 [95% CI = 0.92, 2.94]) predicted reinjury, but quadriceps strength symmetry predicted secondary ACL injury (B = 0.021, P = .05, OR = 1.02 [95% CI = 1.00, 1.04]). Every 1% increase in quadriceps strength symmetry at 6 months increased the risk of reinjury by 2.1%.

A total of 77 patients (49.7%) retuned to activity at >8 months post-ACLR. Among patients with delayed RTA (>8 months), quadriceps strength (B = 0.817, P = .22, OR = 2.26 [95% CI = 0.62, 8.30]) and symmetry (B = 0.014, P = .41, OR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.98, 1.05]) at 6 months did not predict reinjury; however, the time to RTA did predict secondary ACL injury (B = −0.284, P = .042, OR = 0.75 [95% CI = 0.58, 0.98]). Among patients with RTA at >8 months, every month that RTA was delayed resulted in a reduced risk of reinjury by 28.4%.

Relationships Between RTA Assessments

Weak, positive, statistically significant relationships were noted between measures of quadriceps strength at 6 months and all the KOOS subscales, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia score, and Veterans Rand 12-Item questionnaire score (Table 4). We also observed weak, positive, statistically significant relationships between measures of quadriceps symmetry at 6 months and the KOOS subscales for Pain, Sport, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life (Table 4).

Table 4 Relationships Between Quadriceps Strength and Symmetry and Other Variables at 6 Mo After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Who Successfully Returned to Activity^a

View Fullscreen

Return to Activity

The average time of RTA was 8.8 months post-ACLR, with 65% of patients returning to unrestricted physical activity in <9 months and 84% in <12 months (Figure 2). Patients with greater quadriceps symmetry at 6 months had a greater probability of returning to their prior level of physical activity. Younger age has been reported to predict RTA status,¹ perhaps due to increased exposure to activity and sport.¹⁹ Quadriceps strength symmetry also increased the probability of the cohort returning to the preinjury level of activity. This finding supports the current clinical practice of health care providers (including the attending surgeons involved in this study) using quadriceps strength symmetry as a primary measure to manage RTA decisions.^8,20

Reinjury

In the patients who returned to their previous levels of physical activity (n = 155), the reinjury rate increased from 24% to 28% (n = 44/155). This injury rate is consistent with prior reinjury rates (graft or contralateral ACL) after primary ACLR between 10% and 28%.^1,2,10,21,22 The average time from ACLR to reinjury was 19.3 months (range = 6.84–42.9 months), and 68% (n = 30/44) sustained the reinjury in <24 months post-ACLR. Furthermore, the average time from RTA to reinjury was 10.9 months (range = 1 day to 36.8 months), and the median was 7.35 months, indicating that 50% of reinjuries occurred within 7.35 months of RTA. This result is consistent with earlier reports that after ACLR, individuals are at a high risk of reinjury in the first 2 years when returning to sport.^19,23,24 Sport and activity clearance from health care professionals may be perceived by patients as an unrestricted release to the preinjury functional status. However, biological and functional adaptations have been observed up to 5 years after ACLR,^25–27 so patients should be aware of the predictors of reinjury and counseled appropriately up to and beyond the RTA progression.

Compared with researchers²⁸ who found a difference in reinjury rates depending on the type of graft type used, we demonstrated no differences in the proportions of reinjury between patellar tendon and hamstrings grafts. Graft decisions are commonly based on patient and surgeon preference and often on the age and activity level of the patient, thereby biasing observational studies such as ours. In randomized controlled trials with 2-year outcomes, no influence of graft type on ACLR graft or contralateral ACL reinjury rates was seen.²⁹ In regard to patient sex, no reinjury differences occurred in the overall proportions of males and females, but females had a greater proportion of contralateral ACL injuries, whereas males had a greater proportion of ACLR graft reinjuries. Similar findings were evident in earlier studies,^22,30–32 with greater proportions of ACL graft injuries in males and greater proportions of contralateral ACL injuries in females. Whether the greater incidence of contralateral ACL injuries in females is due to biomechanical adaptations that occur after the initial ACLR or to preexisting conditions that elevate the risk of ACL injury is unknown. This is an area for future research.

Our results support clinicians' current use of clinical assessments to guide RTA decisions.⁸ Better measures for patient subjective function, quadriceps strength, and single-legged hopping performance predicted those who successfully returned to activity (Table 2). Yet, for predicting secondary ACL injury, our research challenges the way these 6-month assessments should be used (Table 3). Patients who demonstrated greater subjective function (KOOS Sport), higher measures of quadriceps symmetry, and more symmetric single-legged hopping (triple hop) at 6 months had a greater probability of reinjury. Our 6-month data were available to the surgeons and other members of the health care team so that they could provide feedback to patients regarding their rehabilitation progress. Objective feedback may influence decisions about RTA progression and clearance. Patients with better measures of subjective function and quadriceps symmetry were more likely to RTA (Table 2). It is possible that individuals with high-level functional outcomes from RTA assessments had increased exposure to subsequent injury via earlier RTA. Prior authors³³ described lower reinjury rates when RTA was later. Traditionally, clinicians base RTA timing on a patient's achievement of optimal strength and symmetry (>90% LSI).¹⁶ Our work suggests that the “reward” of early RTA may increase the risk of secondary injury. Clinicians should discuss this risk-reward paradox with their patients when counseling them about RTA.

To further analyze the clinical utility of these assessments in a similar way as earlier investigators,³³ we stratified the cohort into those who returned to their prior level of activity before versus after 8 months (a previously reported time for release to sport³⁴) and placed nearly equal numbers of patients in each group (early RTA = 78, delayed RTA = 77). For patients with early RTA, these results held true. Greater measures of quadriceps limb symmetry at 6 months increased the odds of reinjury. In patients with delayed RTA, quadriceps strength and symmetry at 6 months did not predict reinjury. Still, for every month that RTA was delayed after 8 months, the probability was reduced by 28%. In patients with early RTA, these findings contradict the current thinking about frequently administered RTA testing.⁹ The common clinical goal is to maximize quadriceps strength and symmetry to reduce the likelihood of reinjury. Qualitative studies have identified patients' perceptions of the need to attain high measures of strength and symmetry to receive clearance for RTA³⁵ and perceived pressures from parents and coaches to do so.³⁶ These beliefs regarding 6-month assessments were not supported by our data; instead, the opposite occurred, such that greater quadriceps symmetry at 6 months actually increased the probability of a second ACL injury. It is important to note that we do not endorse the clinical pursuit of quadriceps weakness or asymmetry to reduce the likelihood of reinjury. Early quadriceps strengthening post-ACLR should be a clinical priority, as it is related to greater subjective function and force attenuation during gait.^37,38 Better quadriceps strength has also been associated with more psychological readiness to RTA, which may enhance the rehabilitation progression.³⁹ In the patients with delayed RTA, 6-month quadriceps strength and symmetry measures did not predict reinjury. This finding is not unexpected because 6-month performance assessments may not accurately represent how the patient is functioning on RTA more than 2 months later. Nonetheless, earlier researchers¹ failed to identify quadriceps strength as an important predictor of reinjury, leading to questions about the utility of this measure.

Our finding of a 28% reduced injury probability per month after 8 months post-ACLR differed from the results of a study²¹ of 69 athletes in which the investigators demonstrated that a delay in return to unrestricted sport did not reduce the probability of knee reinjury after 9 months. They classified knee reinjury as any subsequent injury to either knee, such as meniscal injury, patellar subluxation, or secondary ACL graft rupture, which varied from our metric of an isolated secondary ACL injury. Delaying RTA to reduce ACL reinjury after 8 months may address the importance of allowing sufficient time after ACLR for proper recovery. Even in patients who score well on subjective and objective measures of function, healing may continue during this time. A proposal⁴⁰ to delay RTA to 2 years after ACLR was based on the biological healing process of the ACLR graft. Ultimately, clinicians who are determining the safest time for return to unrestricted physical activity after ACLR should consider many factors, including subjective readiness, objective function, time since surgery, and exposure to high-risk environments.^41,42 These factors should also be serially measured so that both patients and clinicians are aware of any deteriorating function in advance of reinjury.¹¹

The use of objective data to track outcomes during postoperative rehabilitation through RTA is a vital aspect of patient care. However, the traditional use of strength and hopping data at 6 months after ACLR for RTA decisions, especially less than 8 months after surgery, should be approached with caution based on our results. Quadriceps strength and symmetry data are still clinically valuable because these measures are related to knee function, global function, and patient fear of movement (Table 4).^38,43 With the optimal goal of increasing patient function, commonly evaluated via patient-reported outcomes, 6-month assessments may continue to guide clinicians in identifying functional deficits. Serial assessments after 6 months may offer greater clinical value for assessing patient progression and capturing a more accurate description of function before RTA. Functional assessments at 6 months should guide postoperative treatments and dictate the RTA progression but should be used cautiously for releasing patients to unrestricted activity before 8 months post-ACLR.

Our assessments provide objective measures of function to the patient and clinician to inform decisions that may influence patient outcomes. As with all long-term follow-up studies, our results are limited to the objective measures of patient function that were obtained at the time, although more granular measures of muscular function have since been established. This point-of-care research design represented the actual clinical use of RTA testing and patient outcomes. Also, the outcomes of RTA and reinjury were self-reported. Monitoring and quantifying patient exposures after RTA would strengthen clinical recommendations post-ACLR. The timing of RTA is a controversial topic. Future researchers should focus on the best way to identify the combination of metrics that is most useful in guiding decision making for rehabilitation progression and return to unrestricted physical activity after ACLR. Neither postoperative physical activity nor exposure were tightly controlled or objectively quantified in our work, and these should be areas for future research. Additionally, a larger sample would allow separate prediction models for sex and the side of reinjury.