Sport specialization, commonly defined as intensive year-round training in a single sport to the exclusion of other sports, has been associated with an increased risk for overuse injury. Two pathways to becoming highly specialized are recognized: (1) having only ever played 1 sport (exclusive highly specialized) and (2) quitting other sports to focus on a single sport (evolved highly specialized). Understanding the differences in injury patterns between these groups of highly specialized athletes will inform the development of injury-prevention strategies. To compare the distribution of injury types (acute, overuse, serious overuse) among evolved highly specialized athletes, exclusive highly specialized athletes, and low-moderately specialized athletes. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary care pediatric sports medicine clinic between January 2015 and April 2019. A total of 1171 patients (age = 12.01–17.83 years, 59.8% female) who played ≥1 organized sports, presented with a sport-related injury, and completed a sports participation survey. Distribution of injury types (acute, overuse, serious overuse). The percentage of injuries due to overuse was similar between the exclusive and evolved highly specialized athletes (59.2% versus 53.9%; P = .28). Compared with low-moderately specialized athletes, exclusive and evolved highly specialized athletes had a higher percentage of overuse injuries (45.3% versus 59.2% and 53.9%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis of the highly specialized groups revealed sport type to be a significant predictor of a higher percentage of injuries due to overuse, with individual-sport athletes having increased odds of sustaining an overuse injury compared with team-sport athletes (odds ratio = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.17, 3.24). The distribution of injury types was similar between evolved and exclusive highly specialized youth athletes, with both groups having a higher percentage of injuries due to overuse compared with low-moderately specialized athletes. Among highly specialized athletes, playing an individual sport was associated with a higher proportion of overuse injuries compared with playing a team sport.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Although research indicates that the key to minimizing the effect of musculoskeletal injury, improving care, and mitigating long-term effects is to improve early injury care seeking, little is known about barriers to early musculoskeletal injury disclosure and care seeking. To identify which determinants predicted sport-related musculoskeletal (MSK) injury disclosure by adolescent athletes. Cross-sectional study. Online survey. A total of 564 adolescent athletes (58% male, age = 15.81 ± 1.8 years). Online survey exploring determinants of age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, injury knowledge, attitudes, perceived social norms, and perceived behavioral control surrounding MSK injury disclosure, intention to disclose MSK injury, and actual behavior of disclosing MSK injury. Of the respondents, 457 (80.2%) reported having sustained ≥1 (mean = 3.2 ± 2.2; range = 1–10) MSK injuries related to sport. Those who endorsed having experienced an MSK injury disclosed not reporting or purposefully hiding 77% of their suspected MSK injuries. Several factors influenced a high intention to disclose MSK injury. Specifically, for each unit increase in total MSK injury knowledge (Exp[β] = 1.061, β=0.054, P = .020, 95% CI = 1.031, 1.221) and attitude (Exp[β] = 1.070, β = 0.064, P < .001, 95% CI = 1.027, 1.115) score, 6% and 7% increases in the likelihood of a high intention to disclose an MSK injury, respectively, were observed. Moreover, for each unit increase in the social norm score (Exp[β] = 1.178, β=0.164, P < .001, 95% CI = 1.119, 1.241), an 18% increase in the likelihood of a high intention to disclose an MSK injury was noted. Designing interventions geared toward increasing the knowledge of signs and symptoms of MSK injury, improving attitudes surrounding disclosure, and better understanding the social context of disclosing MSK injuries may improve MSK injury disclosure behavior and reduce the associated social and economic burdens of these injuries.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Pediatric mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) represent an evolving field of interest in youth athletics. Although most players recover within 4 weeks, some have symptoms that last longer. Little is known about youth health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after mTBI. To characterize youth HRQoL after soccer-related mTBI and to identify predictors of individual differences in HRQoL recovery. Prospective cohort study. Youth soccer. Soccer players, aged 8 to 17 years, who sustained an mTBI (n = 23) or orthopaedic injury (OI, n = 24) or remained uninjured (n = 23) during a single season. We assessed HRQoL via the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, version 4.0, and postconcussive symptoms via the Health and Behavior Index. Serial assessments occurred at 24 to 48 hours, 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days postinjury via telephone interview. At 7 days postinjury, the mTBI and OI groups had poorer total HRQoL (F2,67 = 11.35, P < .001) than the uninjured control group. At 7 days, the mTBI group had the poorest psychosocial HRQoL, whereas the OI group had the poorest physical HRQoL. Differences between the mTBI and uninjured control groups resolved by 30 days. Within the mTBI group, players with significant postconcussive symptoms at 7 days had poorer total (F1,21 = 23.071, P ≤ .001; F1,21 = 5.798, P = .028), psychosocial (F1,21 = 16.488, P = < .001; F1,21 = 5.050, P = .039), and physical (F1,21 = 21.671, P = < .001; F1,21 = 5.119, P = .038) HRQoL at 7 and 30 days, respectively, than players with minimal symptoms; these differences resolved by 90 days. As a group, youth soccer players who sustained mTBI had transient impairments in HRQoL that resolved by 30 days. A subset of players with significant postconcussive symptoms at 7 days postinjury had poorer HRQoL for at least 30 days postinjury than those whose postconcussive symptoms had resolved within a week of injury. This suggests ongoing recovery in this subset at 30 days and the potential utility of HRQoL as a measure of recovery.Context
Objectives
Design
Setting
Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
The Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, fifth edition (SCAT5), remains the consensus instrument for concussion evaluation in youth athletes. Both child and parent are recommended to complete the athlete background and symptom reporting. To determine the level of agreement between child and parent medical history and symptom reporting and quantify their performance on the Child SCAT5 in male football athletes. Cross-sectional study. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I college football facility. A total of 157 youth male football athletes (age = 10.7 ± 1.3 years) participating in a university-sanctioned youth football camp and their parent or legal guardian. Youth athletes and their parent completed the athlete background (demographics, diagnosed medical history) and symptom evaluation (symptom items, total number of symptoms, and symptom severity score) of the Child SCAT5 and were instructed not to discuss reporting with each other during testing. Cronbach α tests were conducted to determine the internal consistency, and descriptive statistics determined the level of agreement between medical history, symptom reporting, and baseline performance. The internal consistency of the symptom items was high for both child (Cronbach α = 0.91) and parent (α = 0.92). Agreement on medical history ranged from 67% (learning disability or dyslexia) to 85% (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), with 82% agreement on sustaining a previous concussion. Fourteen youth athletes reported having been hospitalized for a head injury, with zero matched parent confirmations. Individual symptom agreement ranged from 70.7% (gets distracted easily) to 94.9% (going to faint). Agreement was 35% on total number of symptoms and severity. Abnormal scoring ranged from 2% (going to faint) to 25% (headache) for child and 2% (double vision) to 28% (gets distracted easily) for parent reporting. Fair agreement was shown between children and their parent on medical history and self-reported symptoms on the Child SCAT5 at baseline. When available, child and parent reporting should be used for concussion assessment and clinical decision-making.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Reaction time (RT) is a critical element of return to participation (RTP), and impairments have been linked to subsequent injury after a concussion. Current RT assessments have limitations in clinical feasibility and in the identification of subtle deficits after concussion symptom resolution. To examine the utility of RT measurements (clinical drop stick, simple stimulus-response, single-task Stroop, and dual-task Stroop) to differentiate between adolescents with concussion and uninjured control individuals at initial assessment and RTP. Prospective cohort study. A pediatric sports medicine center associated with a regional tertiary care hospital. Twenty-seven adolescents with a concussion (mean age = 14.8 ± 2.1 years; 52% female; tested 7.0 ± 3.3 days postconcussion) and 21 uninjured control individuals (mean age = 15.5 ± 1.6 years; 48% female). Participants completed the Post-Concussion Symptoms Inventory (PCSI) and a battery of RT tests: clinical drop stick, simple stimulus-response, single-task Stroop, and dual-task Stroop. The concussion group demonstrated slower clinical drop stick (β = 58.8; 95% CI = 29.2, 88.3; P < .001) and dual-task Stroop (β = 464.2; 95% CI = 318.4, 610.0; P < .001) RT measures at the initial assessment than the uninjured control group. At 1-month follow up, the concussion group displayed slower clinical drop stick (238.9 ± 25.9 versus 188.1 ± 21.7 milliseconds; P < .001; d = 2.10), single-task Stroop (1527.8 ± 204.5 versus 1319.8 ± 133.5 milliseconds; P = .001; d = 1.20), and dual-task Stroop (1549.9 ± 264.7 versus 1341.5 ± 114.7 milliseconds; P = .002; d = 1.04) RT than the control group, respectively, while symptom severity was similar between groups (7.4 ± 11.2 versus 5.3 ± 6.5; P = .44; d = 0.24). Classification accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) values were highest for the clinical drop stick (85.1% accuracy, AUC = 0.86, P < .001) and dual-task Stroop (87.2% accuracy, AUC = 0.92, P < .002) RT variables at initial evaluation. Adolescents recovering from concussion may have initial RT deficits that persist despite symptom recovery. The clinical drop stick and dual-task Stroop RT measures demonstrated high clinical utility given high classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to detect postconcussion RT deficits and may be considered for initial and RTP assessment.Context
Objectives
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
A mobile application neurocognitive assessment has been used in place of equipment-intensive computerized neurocognitive-assessment protocols. A previous study showed high to very high test-retest reliability of neurocognitive assessment using the mobile application in healthy adults, but no researchers have explored test-retest reliability, reliable change indices (RCIs), and sex effects in middle school and high school populations when conducted 1 year apart. To examine the test-retest reliability and RCIs of baseline data collected at 2 time points approximately 1 year apart using a mobile application neurocognitive test in middle school and high school athletes. The secondary purpose was to investigate sex differences in neurocognitive measures. Cross-sectional study. Institution. A total of 172 middle school and high school healthy student-athletes (mean age = 13.78 ± 1.59 years). Mobile application neurocognitive test scores (reaction time, impulse control, inspection, and memory). Neurocognitive measures had low test-retest reliability across a 1-year time period in the middle and high school settings. Upon retesting, reaction time and inspection time improved in both middle and high school athletes, and impulse control improved in middle school athletes. More athletes in middle school showed RCI improvements compared with high school athletes. Although both males and females demonstrated improvements in neurocognitive measures throughout adolescence, males outperformed females in reaction time and impulse control. A mobile application neurocognitive test displayed unacceptably low test-retest reliability, most likely due to the cognitive development occurring throughout adolescence. Additionally, significant RCIs were noted. These naturally occurring improvements due to cognitive development could mask postconcussion deficits. Age and sex warrant consideration with respect to the neurocognitive performance of middle and high school athletes.Context
Objectives
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
To investigate whether lower limb strength is reduced in people with patellar tendinopathy (PT) compared with asymptomatic control individuals or the asymptomatic contralateral limb. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. To be included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were required to be peer reviewed, published in the English language, and case control investigations; include participants with a clinical diagnosis of PT and an asymptomatic control or contralateral limb group; and include an objective measure of lower limb maximal strength. We extracted descriptive statistics for maximal strength for the symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs of individuals with PT and the limb(s) of the asymptomatic control group, inferential statistics for between-groups differences, participant characteristics, and details of the strength-testing protocol. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for analytical cross-sectional studies. Of the 23 included studies, 21 reported knee strength, 3 reported hip strength, and 1 reported ankle strength. Random-effects models (Hedges g) were used to calculate the pooled effect sizes (ESs) of muscle strength according to the direction of joint movement and type of contraction. The pooled ESs (95% CI) for maximal voluntary isometric contraction knee-extension strength, concentric knee-extension strength, and concentric knee-flexion strength were 0.54 (0.27, 0.80), 0.78 (0.30, 1.33), and 0.41 (0.04, 0.78), respectively, with all favoring greater strength in the asymptomatic control group. Researchers of 2 studies described maximal eccentric knee-extensor strength with no differences between the PT and asymptomatic control groups. In 3 studies, researchers measured maximal hip strength (abduction, extension, and external rotation), and all within-study ESs favored greater strength in the asymptomatic control group. Isometric and concentric knee-extensor strength are reduced in people with PT compared with asymptomatic control individuals. In contrast, evidence for reduced eccentric knee-extension strength in people with PT compared with asymptomatic control individuals is limited and inconsistent. Although evidence is emerging that both knee-flexion and hip strength may be reduced in people with PT, more examination is needed to confirm this observation.Objective
Data Sources
Study Selection
Data Extraction
Data Synthesis
Conclusions
Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury often occurs during rapid deceleration and change-of-direction maneuvers. These activities require an athlete to generate braking forces to slow down the center of mass and change direction in a dynamic environment. During preplanned cutting, athletes can use the penultimate step for braking before changing direction, resulting in less braking demand during the final step. During reactive cutting, athletes use different preparatory movement strategies during the penultimate step when planning time is limited. However, possible differences in the deceleration profile between the penultimate and final steps of preplanned and reactive side-step cuts remain unknown. To comprehensively evaluate deceleration during the penultimate and final steps of preplanned and reactive cutting. Cross-sectional study. Laboratory. Thirty-six women (age = 20.9 ± 1.7 years, height = 1.66 ± 0.07 m, mass = 62.4 ± 8.7 kg). Participants completed 90° side-step cutting maneuvers under preplanned and reactive conditions. Approach velocity, velocity at initial contact, and cutting angle were compared between conditions. Stance time, deceleration time, and biomechanical indicators of deceleration were assessed during the penultimate and final steps of preplanned and reactive 90° cuts. Separate repeated-measures analysis-of-variance models were used to assess the influence of step, condition, and their interaction on the biomechanical indicators of deceleration. Approach velocity (P = .69) and velocity at initial contact of the penultimate step (P = .33) did not differ between conditions. During reactive cutting, participants achieved a smaller cutting angle (P < .001). We identified a significant step-by-condition interaction for all biomechanical indicators of deceleration (P values < .05). A lack of planning time resulted in less penultimate step braking and greater final step braking during reactive cutting. As a result, participants exhibited a decreased cutting angle and longer stance time during the final step of reactive cutting. Improving an athlete’s ability to respond to an external stimulus may facilitate a more effective penultimate step braking strategy that decreases the braking demand during the final step of reactive cutting.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Intervention
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Athletic trainers (ATs) often care for patients with ankle sprains. Expert consensus has been established for rehabilitation-oriented assessments (ROASTs) that should be included in ankle-sprain evaluations. However, the methods ATs use to determine return-to-activity readiness after an ankle sprain are unknown. To identify ATs’ methods for determining patients’ return-to-activity readiness after an ankle sprain and demographic characteristics of the ATs and their methods. Online survey. Cross-sectional study. We recruited 10 000 clinically practicing ATs. A total of 676 accessed the survey, 574 submitted responses (85% completion rate), and 541 respondents met the inclusion criteria. We distributed an online survey to ATs that asked about their assessment of pain, swelling, range of motion, arthrokinematics, strength, balance, gait, functional capacity, physical activity level, and patient-reported outcomes in deciding return to activity. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize participant demographics and frequencies of the assessment measures used by ATs. Chi-square analysis was conducted to identify relationships between the demographics and assessment selection. Pain, swelling, range of motion, strength, balance, gait, and functional capacity were assessed by 76.2% to 96.7% of ATs. Arthrokinematics, physical activity level, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed by 25.3% to 35.1% of participants. When selecting specific assessment methods, ATs often did not use recommended ROASTs. Athletic trainers with higher degrees, completion of more advanced educational programs, employment in nontraditional settings, more clinical experience, and familiarity with expert consensus recommendations were more likely to use ROASTs. Before approving return to activity for patients with ankle sprains, ATs did not use some recommended outcomes and assessment methods. Practice in nontraditional settings, more advanced degrees, more clinical experience, and familiarity with expert consensus guidelines appeared to facilitate the use of ROASTs.Context
Objectives
Setting
Design
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Athletic trainers (ATs) inconsistently apply rehabilitation-oriented assessments (ROASTs) when deciding return-to-activity readiness for patients with an ankle sprain. Facilitators and barriers that are most influential to ATs’ assessment selection remain unknown. To examine facilitators of and barriers to ATs’ selection of outcome assessments when determining return-to-activity readiness for patients with an ankle sprain. Cross-sectional study. Online survey. We sent an online survey to 10 000 clinically practicing ATs. The survey was accessed by 676 individuals, of whom 574 submitted responses (85% completion rate), and 541 respondents met the inclusion criteria. The survey was designed to explore facilitators and barriers influencing ATs’ selection of pain; ankle-joint swelling, range of motion, arthrokinematics, and strength; balance; gait; functional capacity; physical activity level; and patient-reported outcome assessments when making return-to-activity decisions for patients after an ankle sprain. The survey asked for reasons that participants chose to use or not use each measure (eg, previous education, personal comfort, most appropriate, available or feasible, perceived value, and other). The survey contained 12 demographic items that characterized the sample of respondents and were examined as potential influences on the facilitators and barriers. Chi-square analysis was used to identify relationships among participant demographics and facilitators of or barriers to assessment selection. Selection of each ROAST and non-ROAST was most commonly facilitated by previous education, availability or feasibility, or perceived value. Avoidance of each ROAST was most often caused by the lack of previous education, availability or feasibility, or perceived value. The presence of facilitators and barriers was affected by various demographic variables. A variety of facilitators and barriers affected ATs’ implementation of expert-recommended assessments when determining return-to-activity readiness in patients with an ankle sprain. Some subpopulations of ATs experienced more favorable or prohibitive conditions for assessment use.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Results
Conclusions
Although guidance is available, no nationally recognized standard exists for medical documentation in athletic training, leaving individual organizations responsible for setting expectations and enforcing policies. Previous research has examined clinician documentation behaviors; however, the supervisor’s role in creating policy and procedures, communicating expectations, and ensuring accountability has not been investigated. To investigate supervisor practices regarding support, hindrance, and enforcement of medical documentation standards at an individual organization level. Mixed-methods study. Online surveys and follow-up interviews. We criterion sampled supervising athletic trainers (n = 1107) in National Collegiate Athletic Association member schools. The survey collected responses from 64 participants (age = 43 ± 11 years; years of experience as a supervisor = 12 ± 10; access rate = 9.6%; completion rate = 66.7%), and 12 (age = 35 ± 6 years; years of experience as a supervisor = 8 ± 5) participated in a follow-up interview. We used measures of central tendency to summarize survey data and the consensual qualitative research approach with a 3-person data analysis team and multiphase process to create a consensus codebook. We established trustworthiness using multiple-analyst triangulation, member checking, and internal and external auditing. Fewer than half of supervisors reported having formal written organization-level documentation policies (n = 45/93, 48%) and procedures (n = 32/93, 34%) and an expected timeline for completing documentation (n = 24/84, 29%). Participants described a framework relative to orienting new and existing employees, communicating policies and procedures, strategies for holding employees accountable, and identifying purpose. Limitations included lack of time, prioritization of other roles and responsibilities, and assumptions of prior training and record quality. Despite a lack of clear policies, procedures, expectations, prioritization, and accountability strategies, supervisors still felt confident in their employees’ abilities to create complete and accurate records. This highlights a gap between supervisor and employee perceptions, as practicing athletic trainers have reported uncertainty regarding documentation practices in previous studies. Although supervisors perceive high confidence in their employees, clear organization standards, employer prioritization, and mechanisms for accountability surrounding documentation will result in improved patient care delivery, system outcomes, and legal compliance.Context
Objective
Design
Setting
Patients or Other Participants
Data Collection and Analysis
Results
Conclusion
Reliability and Validity of the Functional Assessment of Neurocognition in Sport (FANS): A Paradigm Shift in Post-Concussion Return-to-Sport Decision-Making
Driving After Concussion: Clinical Measures Associated with Post-concussion
The role of shoulder posture in pitching mechanics and injury risk in high school baseball pitchers
Corticospinal Excitability during Standing and Its Association with Postural Control Following Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain.
The socio-economic cost of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and lateral ankle sprains in amateur football and basketball.
JAT eISSN: 1938-162X
JAT ISSN: 1062-6050
ATEJ ISSN: 1947-380X